nae a belger wrote:
Believe Niall has connections with them.
He's not the only one.
I think I can be generally reassuring on this topic.
"Right wing" is probably a reasonable description although the SDA prefers to use the term "common sense", and we are still probably to the left of the unionist parties. Scottish politics are to the left of British politics just as they are to the left of the Americans.
So you have the SRSM, Solidarity and SSP on the left, Greens and SSP in the middle and SDA on the right. No idea where the FSP are these days.
Policy is to refuse to stand against the SNP if it would threaten Independence. Post-Independence would be a different matter. By-elections too can be contested provided Independence is not thereby threatened. Of course in the real world the SDA's electoral experience is "somewhat behind" that of the SNP!
:)
The main differences in policy concern the EU, NATO and currency but there are lots of smaller differences which add up to the aforementioned "right wing" feel. Oh, and as far as I can make out Siol nan Gaidheal is not a proscribed organisation.
I think Mr Salmond would prefer an SDA opposition to the current shambles. It would be far more constructive.
As for the unionist media declaring a split in nationalism, well, so far the only places I've seen the SDA mentioned have been on Scottish Review, Bella, CalMerc and Newsnet. Surprised that nobody here is familiar with Upstake's regular contributions.
_________________
><Chan eil mise nam Bhreatannach